Friday, January 15, 2010

Mighty Morphin Power Ranger Belt Buckle

Letter No. 76

At, January 15, 2010
The reminder of the tragedy of December 6, 1989 Polytechnic suddenly figured prominently in my recent "Letters from Malawi '. Neither the years nor the fact of living so far in Africa can not erase the sad memories. So I traced from the writings that I've forgotten shared. I still have another that I had translated and offered to publish in the newspaper 'The Gazette, Montreal. Since this has never happened, it's time you disclose it.
Firearms and American constitutional law
According to the National Association of Firearms United States (National Rifle Association ) "... the U.S. constitutional right to own and carry a firearm can be violated. " This quote is embedded in the masonry construction of the NRA in Washington and has its origin in the second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
However, the three dots "... " the beginning of the quotation suggest a phrase that has been intentionally omitted. However, the idea that the U.S. Constitution grants a right to possess a firearm is shattered by this omission. What is it?
The complete sentence reads; "a regular militia is necessary for state security. Thus, American constitutional law to possess and carry a firearm can not be infringed. " The prerequisite for exercising this right is therefore conditional on the need to form a militia where conditions warrant. This made sense at the time of New England. At that time, the population has categorically rejected the idea of creating an army to the king's example, which at its discretion, could enlist the simple people and declare war. The militia was an alternative that meets the needs of the then newly established American Republic. In an emergency, the militia could be called by the President of the United States of America and returned home after the unrest ended.
These militias are gone. Indeed, the United States is today the largest military power in the world. It has the necessary weapons for its national security. Historically, the right of American citizens to own a firearm they were granted to meet a requirement that has lost its raison d'etre for a very long time.
Today, supporters of U.S. law to own and carry a firearm use a constitutional right that is obsolete. They manipulate the words of the U.S. Constitution to sell firearms without hindrance. This justification has become an ideology contrary to the ideals founders of the United States of America.
In Canada, it is otherwise. Our Constitution has never granted a right to own or carry a firearm. It is a privilege, for example, to sport hunters. This privilege is not questioned by the Federal Law on the Control of Firearms. This is pure fabrication to claim, as stated by the NRA, that the law in a context of international conspiracy to ban all weapons. It is fair to say that the NRA has disproportionately influence on our Canadian politicians to impose an ideology that has no place in Canada.

New Comment, 10 years later
Guns are made to kill. The uncontrolled possession of a firearm increases the risk of slaughter. Despite the existence of a Canadian law for the verification of such weapons, too many women are murdered in Canada not to mention children and men. By cons, this is not because a depressed husband kills his wife, his children and commits suicide with a firearm registered as the law on gun control is worthless. Appreciate the hundreds or thousands of people who are still alive with this law.
The NRA says it is a right to possess a firearm.
I say it's a privilege.
The NRA basic ideology on American constitutional law.
I say that the NRA has manipulated the spirit of this constitution. The NRA argues
Canada.
I say she should stay in the U.S..
also affirm that the unrestricted sale of firearms is a crime against humanity.
It is for Canadians to demand that their elected representatives, MPs and MLAs, to resist any change in the law on control of firearms. It not only a matter of life or death, but of national integrity.
Whether humans are killing each other has always agree!
That there are people sick ... for revenge, okay!
That's why we stopped believing in God or in Jesus saying this is a sham! No!
I say that we've already won the victory over the world by our faith (1 John 5:4).
Father Serge St-Arneault M. Afr
See the website of the Missionaries of Africa on www.mafr.net

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Where To Learn Greco Roman

Letter No. 75 of Malawi Malawi

At, 1 January 2010

"If God or Jesus exists, why does it allow so much violence?
Returning to earth is a sham ...
"

The twentieth anniversary of the Polytechnique tragedy leaves no one indifferent. My poem of 6 December on the Internet and published in the Journal of the Church of Three Rivers this month has triggered various reactions. I received several messages of support. In other cases, such as Françoise David, there is a real sympathy without adhering to the spiritual dimension of the poem. It is true that it is a prayer.

A comment via electronic link of the newspaper The Echo Toque (http://www.lechodelatuque.com/article-409850-Ce-jourla.html) argues that " Marc Lepine was not sick. He believed only something in its 'ideal' . In this I agree with Mark's mother who confirmed saying that " for himself was to become black or white, good or bad, belief or suspicion, man or woman. He was always adamant, loved or hated, just like me in some difficult times in my life, and found no compromise to the opposition. (...) His gesture has proved insane, he went from one extreme to another, without even thinking there could be a happy medium in all "(Harold Gagné's book entitled 'Living', p. 132). Marc Lepine was not sick. He was disturbed by a false image of women. (See attached article I wrote about this in the newspaper La Presse in Montreal a decade ago.)

Far be it from me to condemn her mother. All of us at one time or another in our lives, we were also disturbed, agitated, disturbed or disrupted. So where does this assertion of the same commentator who exclaims, saying, "if God or Jesus exists, why does it allow so much violence? Returning to earth is a sham ... ? Blaise N. adds that it does no good to always rely on God or Jesus. "Let's stop believe what is not. The real business is that there are sick people on this earth and nobody can do anything. Historically the people killing each other .

Whether humans are killing each other has always agree!
That there are people sick ... for revenge, okay!
That's why we stopped believing in God or Jesus, then, I'm disagree.

Accusing God or Jesus for the violence we are the sole responsibility equivalent to denying the incarnation of Love.
Refusing to rely on God or Jesus is to confess our pride to live without faith or law.
The truth is simple: we reject Jesus by claiming 'it's a sham'!
The truth is that the Man-God is indeed came to earth and we do not want to host it.
The real business is that we're all sick about this land and there is someone who can heal us of the bitterness; Jesus.

"If I knew," said the mother of Mark, I would have taken in my arms and I would have told him not to worry. Love, truth, arises when you least expect it. "Dear Mom

Marc
We would have liked to cry with you 20 years ago but you were not found
We prayed for you as you prayed for yourself all the bereaved mothers because of your son.

long will this hatred?
long will this rage?
Until when this tragedy?

Until the day we decide to abandon
our pride until the day we say, 'I forgive'
Until the day when the sacred gift of Jesus on the cross
inspire our lives Until the day we will live our death instead of letting die life


MURDER OF AN IMAGE
My sister Annie was murdered at the age of 23 years. This tragedy happened Dec. 6, 1989. That day, a young man enters the École Polytechnique in Montreal with a semi-automatic rifle legally purchased a few days earlier. Within 22 minutes, He shot 28 people. Fourteen women were killed.

The shock wave propagates across the country and beyond borders. The victims are killed for the sole reason of being women. Taken at random, they symbolize the eyes of the abuser's unhappiness. He can no longer discern the reality of his imaginary impulses. A distorted image of women traumatized this young man. He became enraged, claiming that 'feminists have ruined his life.

The ease with which the killer acquires a firearm with ammunition is further troubling. He entered without inspection at an institution of higher education and executes its plan for the police department in shambles. The carnage ends in a burst of conscience after stabbing his last victim.

Suddenly, the horror of his act insane has nothing comparable with these violent films he likes where death is commonplace. There is no way to remove the screen. Blood covered his hands. The cries of anguish are silent forever. The image shatters like a mirror, giving way to real faces. The damage is done. He then returned the weapon against himself. It is the latest victim of another image, that of the hero fighters that are running their own righteousness.

In June 1998 I had the honor to know Paul Hebert, venerable actor renowned. Like me, he participated in Quebec to award students who participated in a writing activity on problems of sexism and violence in society. "Aggressive , he says, is an inescapable reality of our human condition. We are born with it. Someone who would be so low that it lacks become incapable of projecting into the future. It is like an engine that allows us to remain upright face of hardship of life. Our freedom lies in choosing to exercise this aggressiveness or control. "

In this regard, the genius advertising capitalizes on an image by focusing on a specific point which leaves little alternative to the consumer. However, according to Paul Hebert, dramatic play is fascinating in that the word suggests a thought instead of the image thing. He rightly states that we must be wary of the image. Some photographic and computer trickery gives a picture more lifelike. Frustration forces, wants to succeed at the same rate as the images too quickly evaporated.

Contrary to the image, the word is more respectful. By his suggestion, it preserves the freedom of the listener who judges based on merit. He can then make your own opinion.

Beautiful images inspire calm and cool while some words attack. Clearly, a menacing image of the woman caused the death of my sister Annie and her 13 companions. The murderer was frightened found no word on his way constructive to allow it to internally balance the aggressiveness he wore. A false picture has so far owned his own misfortune. More than

picture, I lost one I love. I miss her confidence and her laughter. My family and I still cry when this extraordinary woman and determined to push back the frontiers of the impossible. It felt like discovering the world. In response to a call deeper, she hoped to join me in Africa where I spent my life as a missionary.

An excerpt from the book "illusion or the misadventures of a reluctant messiah" of the novelist Richard Bach has been instrumental in it; "it is not thy never given a wish without you is given the power to make it reality. .. but you can nevertheless be obliged to toil for it . Like his companions in misfortune, Annie has not had a chance to grieve for long enough.

I mean the victims because the media talk too aggressors. Headlines cite their names so that those killed appear only briefly in the statistics. It is time to change roles. The killing of women is a terrible loss. That is what the Women's Monument inaugurated at Thornton Park in Vancouver December 6, 1997 will be served. I am a witness to be assisted with some members of my family.

Followers of sport hunting are not provided potential criminals simply because they love guns. It would be wrong to want to blame men by insinuating that they all follow a pattern of abusive behavior. Propose the establishment of a repressive policy 'against men is really absurd. The destructive agent of our company is rather the culture of violence associated with a cult of firearms that some U.S. activists see the 'divine right'.

The tragedy of the Polytechnic is the trigger of a desire for 80% of Canadians support a stricter control of firearms. This will is expressed in Bill C-68 of the federal government. The price to pay to protect public safety against the misuse of firearms may seem exaggerated but can be summarized by a simple and convincing, everyone is responsible for his gun. What does it stand? A system for recording a half-billion or costs over $ 6 billion annually following the deaths and injuries related to firearms.

According to the final declaration of Montreal North American Congress of Educators for Peace held August 23, 1998, the dialogue is the only way to lay the groundwork for a culture peace and nonviolence that can replace the culture of death. Respect for human life manifested in the acceptance of differences. To be true peace requires forgiveness. It is also important to stress Paul Hebert, the opposite of gratuitous violence.

What image do I retain? No more trick possible. Like those murdered today, the faces of my sister Annie and her friends are forever disfigured.

In his delirium, a young man wanted to destroy an idol that frightened.
Unbeknownst to her, instead he disfigured the face of humanity where every person is a sacred history.

I need a word of comfort. In his desire to meet God offers a word. She never needed. This suggests a place of dialogue where hearts meet. That may be why the biblical Book of Wisdom prohibits to make an image of God.